DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
RR ARR CAR SRAM Oo aA AO COR
DWAR FT Ae iON WP PN BA A
704 §. COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490
BAN
Docket No.NR05473-14
10 December 2014
This is in reference to your application for correction to your
deceased spouse's naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10
United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 December 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your deceased spouse’s naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also
considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor
Benefit Plan Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) of 9
Oct 2014, a copy of which was provided to you on 28 Oct 2014,
and is being provided to you now.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In making this determination, the Board
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application for your request has been denied.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
evidence within one year from the date of the Board's decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in this case. In this regard, it
Docket No.Nr05473-14
is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
VN?
ROBERT J. ONEILL
Executive Director
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4350 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your | application on 15 December 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3321 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC (memo. NR3321-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3463 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2014. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3974 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 January 2015. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased father’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. NR3974-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3411 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased former husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Decket No, NR3411-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8329 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased spouse's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board also considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Survivor Benefit Program Manager Casualty Assistance (PERS-13) memo of 17 Jul 2014, a copy of which was provided to ‘you en 11 Aug 2014. Conseguently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2015 | NR059 15
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 March 2015. Additionally, the Board considered your response to the Advisory Opinion dated 24 February 2015. : After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5471 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on _ 8 December 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 1800 MMSR-5 dated 23 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR5471-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2156 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2014. 4 However after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR1036 14
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, his naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ~ Therefore, your case was provided to the Board as is for final determination. Consequently, when applying for @ correction of an official naval record, the purden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error of injustice.